Long time APLNJ member Cynthia Radnitz, Ph.D., wrote the following article published by the Journal of Critical Animal Studies, May 2014. We found the article very interesting and thought you would too.
Angi Metler, director
APLNJ
Applying the Argument from Marginal Cases to the Protection of Animal Subjects in Research: A Blueprint for Studying Nonhuman Animals in a Post-vivisection World
Author: Cynthia Radnitz
Title: Professor
Affiliation: Fairleigh Dickinson University
Abstract
Although experimentation on nonhuman animals for both research and product testing continues, there are some signs that we are on a trajectory toward abolition of animal model research due to the combined effects of pressure from animal activists, changing public attitudes toward animal research, improved replacement technologies for both scientific investigation and product testing, and the expense of purchasing, housing and studying animals. Nonetheless, just as we study humans, we may still be interested in studying animals using research paradigms that protect their rights. By applying the Argument from Marginal Cases to animal research guidelines, a plan is presented for shifting toward ensuring the rights of animals by affording them the same status for consideration in research studies as that given to two groups of humans classified as "vulnerable" in laws governing human subjects research, specifically young children and individuals with cognitive impairments. In doing so, we propose the idea of animal assent as an additional layer of protection so that animal research participants are adequately safeguarded.
Link to full article is here. Go to page 51.
|
Sunday, September 7, 2014
A Blueprint for Studying Nonhuman Animals in a Post-vivisection World
Monday, March 12, 2012
GOOD NEWS: Research Halted at Harvard Medical School's Primate Research Center
Thanks to Stop Animal Exploitation NOW! http://www.all-creatures.org/saen/
Full Story, with diagrams and charts: http://www.telegram.com/article/20120301/NEWS/103019866/1101/local
New research halted after another monkey death at primate center in Southboro
By Elaine Thomson, Telegram.com, Thursday, March 1, 2012
SOUTHBORO — Two months after a monkey died of dehydration at Harvard Medical School's New England Primate Research Center another one died Sunday of similar circumstances, bringing the total to four questionable monkey deaths at the facility since June 2010.
As a result all new research at the center has been halted.
This week's death will be part of an investigation the U.S. Department of Agriculture had already undertaken to determine what, if any, penalties will be imposed on Harvard Medical School.
“Four deaths in the last 18 months or so, that's unacceptable. They know they need to do better,” USDA spokesman David Sacks said. (The USDA) “is looking at penalty actions as a result of this, but that investigation has not been completed yet. We will continue to closely monitor them and see that they right their ship ... and get back on proper footing of giving these animals humane care, which I know is what they intend to do.”
Dr. Jeffrey S. Flier, dean of the faculty of medicine at Harvard Medical School, in an email sent to the Telegram & Gazette yesterday, said new research has been stopped to allow time for personnel to create and implement a corrective action plan.
“I care deeply about this issue. The health and ethical treatment of the primates for which we are responsible are among my highest concerns. I want to assure you that the leadership of HMS will be unwavering in our commitment to providing for the welfare of these animals,” he said.
Mr. Sacks said Harvard, as with the other three deaths, self-reported the death that occurred Sunday to one of the USDA's inspectors. He said the federal Animal Welfare Act does not require research centers to report deaths partly because some animals die from natural causes and others die as a result of the research. The Animal Welfare Act, passed by Congress in 1966, requires research facilities to provide their animals with adequate care and treatment in the areas of housing, handling, sanitation, nutrition, water, veterinary care, and protection from extreme weather and temperatures.
Mr. Sacks said he is not sure of the circumstances surrounding the latest death. The Boston Globe, however, reported that a Harvard Medical School official said the elderly cotton top tamarin monkey likely died from a lack of water because it did not have a water bottle in its cage. Mr. Sacks said a USDA inspector will go to the center within the next several days.
The previous deaths occurred in June 2010, and October and December 2011. In the first incident, a monkey was found dead at the bottom of a cage washer after having gone through the washer. In October, a monkey escaped while being taken to a research procedure. It was caught, taken to the procedure and later found dead after being returned to its cage. On Dec. 26, a monkey died of dehydration after a water dispenser was not properly activated. That death was cited in a Jan. 31 USDA inspection report that also said a second monkey was dehydrated but survived. Two other non-compliances involved a monkey suffering a broken leg when the leg was caught under the drop door as it closed; and another injured its foot after it and several other monkeys were able to open the cage that was not properly secured and get outside.
Harvard Medical School said several aggressive steps and corrective measures have been put in place since last summer, including the creation of a quality control unit as a safety net, increased oversight at all levels, staff retraining, implementation of new systems and system redundancies, and MRI testing to improve monitoring and reporting. In September, a new director, interim associate director for administration and veterinary leadership were also brought on board at the research center.
Dr. Flier said the school will build upon those measures.
“I am personally marshaling all necessary resources to confront and resolve the systems, processes and human errors that appear to underlie the recent problems,” he said.
The additional corrective measures include the establishment of another oversight team of veterinary staff and supervisors who will perform additional daily rounds to verify the health and wellness of every animal at the center. The school is also assembling an independent review committee of external prominent experts to assess the primate's center's operations and to help develop a strategy to ensure similar problems don't occur. Co-reporting lines have also been established. The center's director and associate director are now required to report to senior leadership at the medical school, Dr. Flier noted.
Michael Budkie, spokesman for the Ohio-based watchdog group Stop Animal Exploitation Now, said he thinks even more needs to be done. He said the USDA should impose a fine on Harvard Medical School. He said that since 1986 when he started as an animal rights activist, he has never seen a research facility that has had as many negligent deaths of animals in such a short period of time. Harvard has received official warnings in the past, but to his knowledge, never a fine. He said that the National Institutes of Health, which provides the center with research grants, should also be involved in the investigation.
The New England Primate Research Center was established by Congress in 1962 and is one of eight regional primate centers in the country. The sprawling campus, tucked away in the woods from view of passers-by, is on 89 acres in Southboro and 42 acres in neighboring Marlboro, off Parmenter Road near Callahan State Park. According to its website, the center is a leader in primate biomedical research and has provided scientific resources and services to investigators throughout the world.
Dr. Flier said the center's mission is to eradicate disease. Key discoveries enabled by the center have contributed to the understanding of HIV/AIDS, colon cancer, sickle cell anemia, herpes virus, inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease among other disorders, he said.
Full Story, with diagrams and charts: http://www.telegram.com/article/20120301/NEWS/103019866/1101/local
New research halted after another monkey death at primate center in Southboro
By Elaine Thomson, Telegram.com, Thursday, March 1, 2012
SOUTHBORO — Two months after a monkey died of dehydration at Harvard Medical School's New England Primate Research Center another one died Sunday of similar circumstances, bringing the total to four questionable monkey deaths at the facility since June 2010.
As a result all new research at the center has been halted.
This week's death will be part of an investigation the U.S. Department of Agriculture had already undertaken to determine what, if any, penalties will be imposed on Harvard Medical School.
“Four deaths in the last 18 months or so, that's unacceptable. They know they need to do better,” USDA spokesman David Sacks said. (The USDA) “is looking at penalty actions as a result of this, but that investigation has not been completed yet. We will continue to closely monitor them and see that they right their ship ... and get back on proper footing of giving these animals humane care, which I know is what they intend to do.”
Dr. Jeffrey S. Flier, dean of the faculty of medicine at Harvard Medical School, in an email sent to the Telegram & Gazette yesterday, said new research has been stopped to allow time for personnel to create and implement a corrective action plan.
“I care deeply about this issue. The health and ethical treatment of the primates for which we are responsible are among my highest concerns. I want to assure you that the leadership of HMS will be unwavering in our commitment to providing for the welfare of these animals,” he said.
Mr. Sacks said Harvard, as with the other three deaths, self-reported the death that occurred Sunday to one of the USDA's inspectors. He said the federal Animal Welfare Act does not require research centers to report deaths partly because some animals die from natural causes and others die as a result of the research. The Animal Welfare Act, passed by Congress in 1966, requires research facilities to provide their animals with adequate care and treatment in the areas of housing, handling, sanitation, nutrition, water, veterinary care, and protection from extreme weather and temperatures.
Mr. Sacks said he is not sure of the circumstances surrounding the latest death. The Boston Globe, however, reported that a Harvard Medical School official said the elderly cotton top tamarin monkey likely died from a lack of water because it did not have a water bottle in its cage. Mr. Sacks said a USDA inspector will go to the center within the next several days.
The previous deaths occurred in June 2010, and October and December 2011. In the first incident, a monkey was found dead at the bottom of a cage washer after having gone through the washer. In October, a monkey escaped while being taken to a research procedure. It was caught, taken to the procedure and later found dead after being returned to its cage. On Dec. 26, a monkey died of dehydration after a water dispenser was not properly activated. That death was cited in a Jan. 31 USDA inspection report that also said a second monkey was dehydrated but survived. Two other non-compliances involved a monkey suffering a broken leg when the leg was caught under the drop door as it closed; and another injured its foot after it and several other monkeys were able to open the cage that was not properly secured and get outside.
Harvard Medical School said several aggressive steps and corrective measures have been put in place since last summer, including the creation of a quality control unit as a safety net, increased oversight at all levels, staff retraining, implementation of new systems and system redundancies, and MRI testing to improve monitoring and reporting. In September, a new director, interim associate director for administration and veterinary leadership were also brought on board at the research center.
Dr. Flier said the school will build upon those measures.
“I am personally marshaling all necessary resources to confront and resolve the systems, processes and human errors that appear to underlie the recent problems,” he said.
The additional corrective measures include the establishment of another oversight team of veterinary staff and supervisors who will perform additional daily rounds to verify the health and wellness of every animal at the center. The school is also assembling an independent review committee of external prominent experts to assess the primate's center's operations and to help develop a strategy to ensure similar problems don't occur. Co-reporting lines have also been established. The center's director and associate director are now required to report to senior leadership at the medical school, Dr. Flier noted.
Michael Budkie, spokesman for the Ohio-based watchdog group Stop Animal Exploitation Now, said he thinks even more needs to be done. He said the USDA should impose a fine on Harvard Medical School. He said that since 1986 when he started as an animal rights activist, he has never seen a research facility that has had as many negligent deaths of animals in such a short period of time. Harvard has received official warnings in the past, but to his knowledge, never a fine. He said that the National Institutes of Health, which provides the center with research grants, should also be involved in the investigation.
The New England Primate Research Center was established by Congress in 1962 and is one of eight regional primate centers in the country. The sprawling campus, tucked away in the woods from view of passers-by, is on 89 acres in Southboro and 42 acres in neighboring Marlboro, off Parmenter Road near Callahan State Park. According to its website, the center is a leader in primate biomedical research and has provided scientific resources and services to investigators throughout the world.
Dr. Flier said the center's mission is to eradicate disease. Key discoveries enabled by the center have contributed to the understanding of HIV/AIDS, colon cancer, sickle cell anemia, herpes virus, inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease among other disorders, he said.
Friday, September 23, 2011
Princeton gets failing grades for treatment of animals in science research, study finds
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/princeton_gets_failing_grades.html
By Bob Considine/The Star-Ledger
By Bob Considine/The Star-Ledger
Star-Ledger file photo
PRINCETON — Princeton University is receiving failing grades from a medical research group for its treatment of animals used by the school for scientific study.The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a non-profit group that promotes animal rights and vegan diets, ranks Princeton as second worst among the eight Ivy League schools in adhering to minimal standards of the Animal Welfare Act.
One of the school’s greatest offenses, the group says, is "a pattern of deliberate, excessive water restriction in primates" beyond the guidelines set in Animal Welfare Act — some of which resulted in a warning from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or APHIS, earlier this year.
"In this study, Princeton is an example of how much disregard there is for the Animal Welfare Act," said John Pippin, a cardiologist, director of academic affairs for the research group and author of the study, scheduled to be released Wednesday morning. "It’s also an example of and how little its university regulatory body really cares about saying to its own researchers, ‘You know, you really can’t do this.’"
The study, based on animal facility inspection reports by APHIS from January 2008 to July 2011, applied a score relative to violations, repeat violations and National Institutes of Health grant money.
Princeton and Yale universities tied for second-worst with a score of 49, a distance from the worst-ranked school, the University of Pennsylvania, which received a score of 120. Harvard (48), Cornell (38) and Brown (35) and Dartmouth (33) finished with lower scores — meaning higher grades — than Princeton. Columbia University (25) yielded the best results.
Princeton spokesman Martin Mbugua, said the university’s research methods meet approved protocols.
"It’s unfortunate that some groups make efforts to influence the public’s understanding about beneficial research by taking the approach of this report," he said.
Mbugua said all research involving animals is reviewed and approved by Princeton’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, including the use of water scheduling as a research protocol.
In its report, the medical research group said "non-human primates were routinely forced to go more than 24 hours without water." But Mbugua said the report is misleading in its wording.
During an APHIS inspection in late January, water was found to have been removed from two cages and not returned until over 24 hours later. Mbugua said this was an isolated incident caused by an "unanticipated delay" due to a miscommunication. Measures were put in place to avoid such miscommunication again, he said.
In an inspection report, the USDA also admonished the school for not providing proper veterinary care for a pregnant marmoset that was in distress in March. The agency said the attending veterinarian was not informed of the marmoset’s condition.
In response, Mbugua said "to have a veterinarian attend the birth is not common and is not a requirement," as marmosets sometimes deliver in the middle of the night, just as they do in the wild. But he also said a formal process has been implemented so an attending veterinarian is always notified of impending births.
APHIS sent the school an official warning of Violation of Federal Regulations in May, which could have resulted in fines. Mbugua said in an inspection on June 7, APHIS concluded the school had "taken corrective actions and all of the non-compliant items that were identified have either been corrected or corrective actions are in progress."
Pippin, however, said warnings of fines are rare in APHIS correspondences with animal study programs at universities and the response to their criticism are "not just a sign of disrespect, but of arrogance."
Star-Ledger staff writer Kelly Heyboer contributed to this report.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Follow-up on Vivisection Debate
Doris Lin attended the debate and wrote about it on her about.com Animal Rights blog, "Conversation with a Vivisector." Professor Ringach started another debate with her. Read the comments, after the article.
http://animalrights.about.com/b/2011/03/10/conversation-with-a-vivisector.htm
An attorney, Doris also holds a degree in Applied Biological Sciences from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
http://animalrights.about.com/b/2011/03/10/conversation-with-a-vivisector.htm
An attorney, Doris also holds a degree in Applied Biological Sciences from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Top 20 Most Painful Animal Labs
Michael Budkie, of Stop Animal Exploitation NOW, released a report on the top most painful labs in the United States. See the full report below. http://www.all-creatures.org/saen/articles-20110208-unrelievedpain.html
What can you do?
World Laboratory Animal Liberation Week is April 16th - 24th. Learn all you can and please get involved.
What can you do?
World Laboratory Animal Liberation Week is April 16th - 24th. Learn all you can and please get involved.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Vivisection Debate at Rutgers University - March 8 2011
Gary Francione is debating vivisection at Rutgers on March 8, and it's open to the public:
www.abolitionistapproach.com/debate-the-use-of-nonhuman-animals-in-biomedical-research-a-moral-justification/
The topic: The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research: A Moral Justification?
Professor Ringach will argue that we are justified in using animals in experiments; I will argue that we cannot justify animal use in this or in any other context.
The debate will take place in the Baker Trial Courtroom at Rutgers University School of Law, 123 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey, from 6-8 p.m. Vegan refreshments will be served following the debate, which will be videotaped and made available here and on Professor Ringach’s site.
The debate will be sponsored by the Student Bar Association, the American Constitutional Society, and the Federalist Society. The debate will be moderated by John J. Farmer, Jr., Dean and Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law-Newark. Dean Farmer served as Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and as General Counsel of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (commonly known as the 9/11 Commission).
www.abolitionistapproach.com/debate-the-use-of-nonhuman-animals-in-biomedical-research-a-moral-justification/
The topic: The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research: A Moral Justification?
Professor Ringach will argue that we are justified in using animals in experiments; I will argue that we cannot justify animal use in this or in any other context.
The debate will take place in the Baker Trial Courtroom at Rutgers University School of Law, 123 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey, from 6-8 p.m. Vegan refreshments will be served following the debate, which will be videotaped and made available here and on Professor Ringach’s site.
The debate will be sponsored by the Student Bar Association, the American Constitutional Society, and the Federalist Society. The debate will be moderated by John J. Farmer, Jr., Dean and Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law-Newark. Dean Farmer served as Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and as General Counsel of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (commonly known as the 9/11 Commission).
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Let's End Vivisection in New Jersey
Michael Budkie, exec director of Stop Animal Exploitation Now (SAEN) gave a brilliant presentation at the Community Church of Keyport on October 5th as part of their "Life in the Lab: Hidden Truth about Animal Experiments" speaking tour. See more on the tour: http://all-creatures.org/saen/event-eastern-tour-2010.html
Michael captivated the audience as he spoke about the types of experiments performed on animals, the funding sources, the waste, fraud, and abuse. He explained not only how vivisection harms animals, but how it translates to an incalculable cost to humans as well.
One example is how government spends about $50-60 million each year on addicting animals to drugs, which yields nothing useful to human drug addicts. Imagine how many addicts could be helped if that same $50-60 million were available to them in the form of resources, medical care, educational materials, drug rehab, etc.
Michael talked about how everyone can get more involved in this issue. You don't need to be a scientist to understand some basic principles. Human physiology is quite different from other species.
Laurie, who attend the presentation wrote the following:
"Just when you think you know what is going on behind closed doors, trust me, you do not have a clue. The amount of cruelty and neglect is incredible. Ultimately for no reason other than to make money. Michael indicated that researchers on one hand claim that non-humane primates are just like us, therefore justifying the research. Yet on the other hand they say that non-humane primates are not like us, and do not feel pain or distress, justifying the agonizing experiments. Total contradiction!!!!! After sitting and listening to this unbelievable speaker you realize that non-humane primates are just like us when it comes to pain and suffering (whether mental or physical), and yet are not like us since they do not share the same physiological makeup , therefore, rendering experiments virtually useless. So much more was discussed, and so much more must be said on this subject. If you feel as I do that this must be stopped, I am asking everyone to get involved because we can make a difference."
Laurie is right. Making the commitment to get more involved is the first step to ending these atrocities.
Laurie, who attend the presentation wrote the following:
"Just when you think you know what is going on behind closed doors, trust me, you do not have a clue. The amount of cruelty and neglect is incredible. Ultimately for no reason other than to make money. Michael indicated that researchers on one hand claim that non-humane primates are just like us, therefore justifying the research. Yet on the other hand they say that non-humane primates are not like us, and do not feel pain or distress, justifying the agonizing experiments. Total contradiction!!!!! After sitting and listening to this unbelievable speaker you realize that non-humane primates are just like us when it comes to pain and suffering (whether mental or physical), and yet are not like us since they do not share the same physiological makeup , therefore, rendering experiments virtually useless. So much more was discussed, and so much more must be said on this subject. If you feel as I do that this must be stopped, I am asking everyone to get involved because we can make a difference."
Laurie is right. Making the commitment to get more involved is the first step to ending these atrocities.
1. Please visit our website to learn more about the basics and how vivisection has delayed advancements in the top disease categories: http://askuswhy.com/home.htm
2. Learn more about the issues. Michael's website has a wealth of information, links, resources, reports, etc. Please visit: http://all-creatures.org/saen/
3. Read the reports online about experiments taking place near you:
4. Take information from the reports and send to the media. Here's a list of NJ media: www.usnpl.com/njnews.php
5. There is no doubt that this information is painful to read, but in addition to being upset, we urge you to take action. Protest, rally, and educate everyone else you know:
National Primate Liberation Week
(October 16th - October 24th, 2010
Please join Friends of Animals United New Jersey (http://www.faunnj.org/) and Animal Protection League of New Jersey (http://www.aplnj.org/)
When: Friday, October 22nd, 2010 (Note: It's important to leaflet when they are present.)
Time: 2:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Where: UMDNJ Medical/Dental School, 185 S Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07101
**IMPORTANT PARKING UPDATE!!!!**
PLEASE DO NOT park in the PathMark parking lot on Bergen St, across from the UMDNJ! We've learned that from 8am to 4pm on weekdays, this parking lot is monitored by PathMark employees, vigilant for people parking there and then walking across to the UMDNJ. Activists parking there and walking across Bergen St to join the protest MAY BE ticketed/towed at the owner's expense!
THERE IS, however, metered and unmetered parking all along this section of Bergen St, close to where it intersects w/ S. Orange Ave. On this part of Bergen St, there is also a Rite Aid, an IHOP and a KFC, all with ample parking. From any of these locations, you'll walk about half a block up Bergen to where it intersects w/ S.Orange Ave, then turn left onto S.Orange Ave, where we'll be gathered about 1/2 a block down on the left hand side (roughly where S. Orange intersects with Bruce St - in front of the facility where the actual animal testing is done). Please check the following link for a clear overview of the local layout:
PLEASE DO NOT park in the PathMark parking lot on Bergen St, across from the UMDNJ! We've learned that from 8am to 4pm on weekdays, this parking lot is monitored by PathMark employees, vigilant for people parking there and then walking across to the UMDNJ. Activists parking there and walking across Bergen St to join the protest MAY BE ticketed/towed at the owner's expense!
THERE IS, however, metered and unmetered parking all along this section of Bergen St, close to where it intersects w/ S. Orange Ave. On this part of Bergen St, there is also a Rite Aid, an IHOP and a KFC, all with ample parking. From any of these locations, you'll walk about half a block up Bergen to where it intersects w/ S.Orange Ave, then turn left onto S.Orange Ave, where we'll be gathered about 1/2 a block down on the left hand side (roughly where S. Orange intersects with Bruce St - in front of the facility where the actual animal testing is done). Please check the following link for a clear overview of the local layout:
Option B for parking: There is an actual multi-level parking garage at the intersection of S. Orange and Bergen St, annexed to the UMDNJ facility itself. A HUGE sign for this parking garage at 160 Bergen St says P2 PARKING - that's it! This is more secure, obviously, than street parking, but there is a fee: $3.25 pays up to 2 hours/ $7.50 pays up to 12 hours in the parking garage. For those showing up after 4, $3.25 should be enough, since we'll be finishing at 6pm. If there are any additional questions about parking, please call (732) 693-9044 or email anthony@faunnj.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)